We’ve got no money: Designersblock


“We’ve got no money.” That’s what Piers Roberts and Rory Dodd – aka designersblock – say when you ask them why they live and work in a dilapidated former pub in a shabby backstreet off Kingsland Road in East London. But the building is the perfect base for a company that is the raw antidote to the slick commercialism of much of the contemporary design scene. Inside, behind the boarded-up windows of the one-time saloon bar, Roberts and Dodd are making final preparations for this year’s designersblock show (which will have just ended by the time you read this). As usual, the show is being held in a disused building: this year, it was the Tea Building on Shoreditch High Street. Floorplans for the show, marking where each of the 140 designers will exhibit, are pinned to the crumbling wall and the floor is littered with dust-covered samples of exhibitors’ work. Every niche in the building is occupied by curiosities, including teddy bears, wire sculptures and latex-cast body parts.

People are coming and going: designers on mountain bikes drop off CD-roms and others turn up to do DIY around the building (one has knocked a hole in an external wall upstairs and is building a crude balcony out of scrap lumber). Dodd, 39, is squinting at his laptop screen (he has terrible eyesight) and Roberts, also 39, is laid up on a sofa, his left foot swollen horribly following an accident playing football in the street the previous day. Roberts is tall and bearded while Dodd looks like a chimney sweep. Both are irrepressibly optimistic and cheerful and both look like they could do with a bath.

“I tend to front things in terms of talking,” says hat-loving Roberts, who proceeds to philosophise at length from his recliner. “Rory’s the visual one – he’s a magnificent visual editor who can’t see.”

“I think you’re both a few bricks short of a wall, to be honest,” adds Duncan Riches, their assistant.

It’s exactly five years since the first designersblock show was held in London. That event, held in the Truman Brewery in Brick Lane, East London was unlike anything the London design scene had ever witnessed and launched the duo as the country’s most effective – and innovative – champions of young talent. Designers took over the warren of rooms in the building, showing their work against a backdrop of raw industrial architecture, while ?DJs played and a predominantly young crowd sipped beer.

“I had seen things like designersblock before – but only abroad,” recalls Independent on Sunday Culture editor Marcus Field, who was editor of Blueprint magazine at the time. “So it was fresh for Britain. It brought the kind of buzzy fringe event that you get around the Milan and Cologne furniture fairs.”

“It just became something we didn’t expect,” says Roberts, rolling a cigarette. “German TV came, Dutch TV came – no UK TV, though. Several thousand people turned up on the opening night and they’d never seen anything like it.”

In the intervening years, the pair rose to become unofficial ringmasters of the exploding East London design scene, went bankrupt, and then clawed their way back to prominence – if not exactly riches – through their shows. With no cash for plush offices, they now rent the tumbledown pub from the neighbouring Geffrye Museum for a peppercorn fee.

Dodd and Roberts met ten years ago when, as mature students, they both enrolled on a one-year furniture-making course at Rycotewood College in Thame, Oxfordshire. Previously, Roberts had worked in dispatch riding, community care and the local Oddbins (“mental hospitals, bikes and booze,” as he says), while Dodd had sold houses in Suffolk, before trying his hand at furniture making. “I’d had enough of the workshop,” says Dodd, who was in the same quandary many designer-makers find themselves in. “The shitter the work, the more money you earn. You either end up running a factory or you struggle to make high-quality one-off pieces.”

“We knew we’d do something together but we didn’t have a clue what,” says Roberts, but a visit to the Cologne furniture fair in 1997 provided the inspiration. “I went to Ingo Maurer’s first show, held under the Deutzer Brücke – a road-bridge over the Rhine. I didn’t know you could affect people with a design show like that. It was more magical than anything I’d ever seen in my life. I thought, I’ve got to be involved in this sector. The problem was – still is – there are simply no job descriptions out there to define people who drive creative ideas to market; helping people convert their ideas to saleable products.”

Their first venture was a design shop, Same, which opened at the Truman Brewery in July 1998. They set up in the area just as it was becoming one of London’s most vibrant creative quarters, and they felt they would have a ready market for their products, which were mainly sourced from cult overseas designers such as Droog.

“The Truman Brewery was a fantastic environment – there were world-class designers working next to students,” says Dodd. “?Fashion designer Hussein Chalayan, ?musician Talvin Singh, ?DJ Grooverider all had studios there. It was people having a go. Brick Lane was still a backwater; nobody was talking about it.”

Same fitted in perfectly. “It was the first time there had been a shopfront for all this creativity,” says Dodd. “We were promoting and selling quite hardcore stuff. We were selling the whole Droog range – not just the pretty stuff we knew we could sell. But people got it immediately and loved it.”

“We saw a market opportunity to sell design from overseas; stuff that was not really available here,” says Roberts. “There was just SCP, Space and that was about it. It was very exclusive; they were like galleries. But there were all these emerging designers; people who didn’t just want to make things for rich people.”

“They were terribly enthusiastic in the early days,” recalls Field. “Rory is a total design evangelist. Their shop on Brick Lane looked fabulous. It was the scale and the choice of unusual objects – mostly Dutch – that was impressive. I thought they were a little naive about business, but that’s not a bad thing because they wouldn’t have even started otherwise.”

Their lack of business acumen proved decisive, and the shop closed in early 2000. “We burned through all my money – £130,000 – in 18 months,” laughs Roberts. “But that naivety was definitely the reason why it was successful at first,” he adds. “We didn’t do any market research; we didn’t do any demographics. I read up about all that stuff but in the end decided that we would create our own demographic.”

However, the designersblock show survived the closure of the shop, and this quickly became the main vehicle for Roberts and Dodd’s ideas. While still trading on its underground credentials, the show is now a polished brand that occupies a niche left vacant by the bigger, slicker, and more expensive trade shows.

“Trade shows are so dull,” says Dodd. “They’re horrible places for exhibitors and visitors. How many people have turned around to you and said, ‘You’ve got to go to that trade show, it’s really exciting’? What we’ve tried to do is ask what do exhibitors want? What do visitors want? What do the press want?”

“I’d much rather show at designersblock,” one established designer told us. “You don’t sell as much as at 100% Design, but it’s much more fun.”

Designersblock has also gone global, with events in Milan, Seoul and Tokyo (they are holding a show during this month’s Tokyo Design Week). They still hold to their philosophy of using vacant buildings, although their business skills have clearly got sharper: “We can now sell the value of the show to a property developer in terms of raising awareness of the building,” says Roberts. “We do it because we’re interested in it, because we can, and because we think we can get to the stage where we can make money out of it.” Indeed, some designers have been muttering about the increased exhibitor fees for this year’s show.

But Roberts and Dodd see themselves as far more than organisers of an alternative trade show. They believe that they are pioneering ways of helping designers bring their ideas to fruition, and see the shows not so much as selling environments but networking opportunities where people can exchange ideas and forge alliances. For all the government’s talk about the importance of creative industries, they believe the big funding institutions – the Design Council, the British Council and the like – are failing to offer young designers the right kind of support.

Designersblock are moving to fill the gap. This summer, they launched a new initiative called Risk It – a distillation of all their hard-earned knowledge of what makes creative ideas succeed, which they are now marketing as a package to the industry. “We often end up as a mission of last resort – taking in all these slightly odd people who haven’t got anywhere with the big institutions,” says Roberts, who wryly adds that, in the early days, the Design Council refused them funding before they’d even sat down for the meeting. “The problem with institutions is they feel they should be telling you what to do. We come at it from the other side – what are people doing, and how can we help people do it better?”

Risk It is about forging the key relationships – between creative people, funders, marketers and manufacturers – behind any successful project. The approach eschews the contracts, copyright clauses and other paperwork that tend to terrify designers and instead aims to foster trusting relationships. “People don’t know where to go with their ideas,” says Dodd. “They give them away for very little and they get upset. If you want people’s ideas to mature, they have to feel comfortable in their ownership of them. But Risk It shows how you can invite people to help you develop your ideas, with minimum contracts and an identifiable rewards structure.”

Risk It was launched this summer with a show in Whitechapel that presented a range of collaborations between designers and industry, including the electroluminescent lights that Rachel Wingfield has developed with manufacturer Elumin8 (see pages 78-80). Roberts and Dodd continue to shun the establishment but concede that they have started wearing suits occasionally: “The response is amazing,” says Dodd, recalling how, in the early days, potential funders would look aghast when the shabby pair walked in.

But they are too obsessively committed to the design scene to ever become mere impresarios: “I fundamentally like and admire most of the people we work with,” says Roberts, when asked to explain why he does it. “I get angry that people get turfed out of college with no idea what they’re going to do. It upsets me that intelligent, beautiful, creative people get shafted, and get told to go and get a proper job.”

* 저자 / 출처 : Marcus Fairs http://www.icon-magazine.co.uk/issues/october/designersblock.htm

Leave a Reply

Designer’s Open, Leipzig


DESIGNERS’ OPEN 2009 | English Subtitles from DESIGNERS’ OPEN on Vimeo.

독일 라이프치히Leipzig에서 밀고 있는 디자인전시 Designer’s Open의 홍보 동영상. 특이한 점은 영상이 흡사 상업광고를 연상케 한다는 점. 이케아나 기타 등등의 백화점 광고스런..

<비주얼 컬처> 존 워커 지음


비주얼 컬처 _ 존 워커 지음

시각문화학/비주얼컬처스터디스(Visual Culture Studies), 혹은 디자인사의 입문서, 교과서로 적당한 책. 비주얼컬처스터디스가 다루는 오만가지 방법론들이 어떻게 구성되어있는지를 ‘상당히 개괄적으로’ 다루고 있다. 때문에 전체의 그림을 그리기에는 우선 좋다. 하지만 각각의 세부적인 내용을 탐구하기엔 종종 과도하게 요약된 부분도 발견될 정도로 충분치 못하다. (해체주의/해체 부분이 한 페이지 정도이니까..)

번역자는 꽤 심혈을 기울여 한글 번역어를 선택했는데, 일면 흥미롭고 신기하기까지 하다. 아쉬운 건 개중에 불필요하게 쓰인 ‘쌩 외래어’가 없지 않다는 것. 예컨대 ‘비주얼컬처스터디스’는 ‘시각문화학/시각문화이론’ 등 미처 자리잡지 못한 우리말 대신 쓰였으므로 그럴듯 하지만, ‘어트리뷰트’와 같은 번역어는 불필요하다.

예전 ‘표준전과’가 생각나는 책.

모닝글로리의 럭셔리


모닝글로리

모닝글로리가 12월에 선보인 제품들 *사진: 아시아경제

‘럭셔리’ 모닝글로리 中상류층 공략 – 아시아경제.

낙관적인 기사와는 달리 ‘왜 모닝 글로리가 그냥 “문구업체”로 굳어졌는지’를 바로 그 자리에서 보여주는 기사. “이탈리아에서 수입한 원단”만으로는 ‘럭셔리luxury’나 ‘고급’, 혹은 ‘차별화’를 나타내기 힘들다.

<총균쇠> 요약문_2. 환경 차이가 다양화를 빚어낸 모델 폴리네시아


Polinesian Triangle

Polinesian Triangle

1장에서는 소위 ʻ문명ʼ을 지닌 인간이 나타나기 직전의 세계상을 다루면서 일부 대륙(유라시아)에서의 발전이 그 외의 곳들보다 빨랐다는 사실을 여러 고고학적 근거를 들어 설명했다. 2장에서 저자는 19세기 중반의 폴리네시아에서 모리오리족이 멸족한 사건을 예로 들어 환경-역사 간의 연결고리가 실제로 어떻게 작용하는지를 보여준다.
Details »

<총균쇠> 요약문_18. 남북아메리카가 유라시아보다 낙후된 원인


정복의 궁극적 요인인 식량 생산과 가축화ㆍ작물화의 상관성 : 1492년 당시 유라시아에는 가축화된 13종의 대형 포유류가 있었지만 남북아메리카에서 가축화된 대형 포유류는 단 1종(라마)이었다. 작물화에서는 동물성 먹거리의 생산만큼 불균형이 심하지는 않았다. 하지만 남북아메리카는 유라시아에 비해 수렵 채집민이 차지한 지역이 훨씬 더 넓었다. 아메리카에는 가축화ㆍ작물화할 만한 야생 동식물이 없었고 지리적 생태적 장애물로 인해 아메리카의 다른 지역에서 작물화된 식물이나 가축화된 소수의 동물들이 도입될 수도 없었다.
Details »

<총균쇠> 요약문_17. 동아시아와 태평양 민족의 충돌


남중국으로부터 자바나 뉴기니로의 이주, 즉 ‘오스트로네시아인의 팽창’은 지난 6000년 동안의 최대 인구이동이라고 할 수 있다. 남중국인들은 어떻게 인니 전역으로 이주하여 원주민을 교체하고 폴리네시아인이 되었을까? 왜 그 반대로 진행되지 않았던 것일까? Details »

착하게 살자, 문자동맹.


문자동맹이라는 업체를 혹 아시는지 모르겠군요. 손글씨를 써주면 컴퓨터용 폰트로 만들어주는 곳이죠. 서울 디자인 올림픽 행사를 할 때마다 참가하길래 흥미롭게 봐오던 곳입니다.

헌데 자주 가는 웹사이트에 뜬 글을 통해서 문자동맹이 고객의 손글씨를 도용해 폰트 관련 상품화를 하고 있다는 소식을 접했습니다.
Details »